The report of a new ‘super-predator’ – a carnivore
well-adapted to feeding on prey as large or even larger than itself – in the
fossil record is not particularly rare as a news story.
However, this week’s publication in the Journal of Systematic
Palaeontology, revealing the oldest known metriorhynchid (marine crocodile)
super-predator, is surprising because it was recovered from the Middle Jurassic
Oxford Clay. Many hundreds of specimens
of marine crocodiles are known from this ancient seabed sediment, and they have
been recovered from an area of just under 50 square miles around Peterborough on a large-scale basis for
almost 150 years, courtesy of collectors like Alfred Nicholson Leeds (1847-1917). You might think that after so many years of
fossil hunters searching through the Oxford Clay as it was exposed by
excavators digging the clay for bricks, all the truly large animals from the
ecosystem of that Middle Jurassic sea would have been found by now. And yet in the 21st century it is
still possible to find the fossilised remains of previously undiscovered genera
– from bony fish over 2m long to crocodiles greater than 3m in
length.
It is worthwhile noting that the type specimen of this
newly-described genus and species, excavated by Alfred Leeds between 1907 and
1909, was already regarded by Leeds as being
something special, prior to his death in August 1917. Leeds worked
closely with Charles W. Andrews on the material for the lavishly-illustrated
A Descriptive Catalogue of the Marine Reptiles of the Oxford Clay. It was published in two volumes - part one in 1910 dealing with the ichthyosaurs and
plesiosaurs, and part two in 1913 dealing with the pliosaurs and crocodiles. Although throughout his career he refused to
formally publish or be a co-author, his anatomical opinion was clearly highly
respected by Andrews and other scientists that published on Leeds ’
collection. In private correspondence, Leeds gently rebuked Bill Smellie for creating a new
plesiosaur taxon Apractocleidus out of one of his specimens, pointing out –
long before the true advent of palaeopathology - that in his opinion this was
simply an old or diseased individual of the plesiosaur Cryptoclidus. With the passing of time, Leeds ’
opinion was proved correct.
After the first batch of Alfred’s collection was sold to the
British Museum
(now the Natural History Museum London), Leeds
started a catalogue of his specimens, logging date of discovery,
pit number and the depth at which they were found in the pit. He also recorded their fate – whether sold to
a museum or to the Bonn dealer Stürtz, a regular
house-guest in the Leeds family home of
Eyebury – and identified the specimens, where possible, down to species
level. As someone who had handled so
many thousands of marine reptile bones, he was intimately familiar with their
variations and could confidently attribute them to a given species – his understanding
of anatomy perhaps reflecting his unfulfilled desire to study to become a
medical doctor.
The 670 mm long right lower jaw of the holotype of Tyrannoneustes lythrodectikos. Photograph courtesy of Mark Young |
The journey that was begun around a hundred years ago by
Alfred flagging up this specimen as not fitting within the recognised species
of Metriorhynchus is completed with this week’s publication of the full
description of the fossil as a new taxon in the Journal of Systematic
Palaeontology. In that spirit, we as
authors recognised his contribution, and his first priority as a worker that
correctly identified this animal as a taxonomic anomaly, by giving him a
co-authorship when this paper was first submitted to the journal. The reviewers – in my opinion, quite wrongly
– disagreed with this, and insisted that we removed his name from the
authorship. The inclusion of posthumous
authors on scientific works that have entirely separately been picked up and
finished by other workers is far from without precedent, and it is a shame that
the journal has not seen fit to let Alfred Leeds receive some small recognition
for the huge contribution that he as a collector made to the science of
vertebrate palaeontology. Again, it is
worth noting that this would not have been the traditional authorship
recognition of a collector, whereby a collector is simply rewarded for
discovery of a specimen through being included as an author on the scientific
description: this would have been acknowledging his anatomical expertise, and his
recognition of a new taxon.
Andrews’ second volume of A Descriptive Catalogue of the
Marine Reptiles of the Oxford Clay came out in 1913, and amongst the
crocodiles therein was his suite of new Metriorhynchus species based on
Alfred Leeds’ specimens. For decades
afterwards he was recognised as the authority on these animals, the first
serious revision only being undertaken by Susan Adams-Tresman in the mid 1980s. This week’s publication serves as a fitting opportunity
to belatedly and publicly recognise that, even in the time of Charles Andrews,
there was perhaps one man that knew and understood the variety of different
marine crocodiles present in the Oxford Clay, better than he.
Guest post by Jeff Liston, Co-Author, Yunnan Key Laboratory for Palaeobiology, Yunnan University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, People’s Republic of China.